USPTO serial 76300209
ISOFLAX
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- ESTRADA, LINDA M
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 104 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with ISOFLAX?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
NORTH VANCOUVER, BRITISH COLUMBIA, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Sandra Wright
SANDRA WRIGHT ACCUPRO TRADEMARK SERVICES LTD401 W GEORGE ST STE 702VANCOUVER, BC V6B 5A1CANADAGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 005 | Flax protein powder for use as a dietary supplement | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 12, 2006 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 11, 2006 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 9, 2005 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 8, 2005 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| May 19, 2005 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 18, 2005 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| May 18, 2005 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Nov 16, 2004 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 15, 2004 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 25, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Oct 18, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 18, 2004 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 19, 2004 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 12, 2003 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 20, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jul 25, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 25, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 28, 2003 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 31, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 12, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 21, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 20, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |