USPTO serial 76300325
MIRAVANT MEDICAL TECHNOLOGIES
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MICHOS, JOHN E
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with MIRAVANT MEDICAL TECHNOLOGIES?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Robert G. Lancaster
ROBERT G LANCASTER BRYAN CAVE LLP211 N BROADWAY STE 3600ST LOUIS, MO 63102-2733UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 005 | Pharmaceutical preparations using photodynamic therapy for detecting cancer and lesions, and for use in the treatment and diagnosis of diseases relating to oncology, ophthalmology, urology, dermatology, gynecology, cardiology and immunology (immune therapy) | ACTIVE | — |
| 010 | Medical and ophthalmology devices and equipment used in photodynamic therapy, namely light production and light-delivery devices and accessories therefor, namely, lasers, semiconductor diode light sources, lamps, fiber optics devices, channels, lenses, microlenses, waveguides, diffusion devices, catheter devices, and devices for cutaneous application of pharmaceuticals, sold empty | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Miravant Medical Technologies
- Other trademarks owned by Miravant Medical Technologies
- Other trademarks in Class 005
- Other trademarks in Class 010
- Similar marks named MIRAVANT MEDICAL TECHNOLOGIES
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 8, 2006 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jun 8, 2006 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 21, 2005 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 3, 2005 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Oct 1, 2005 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| May 3, 2005 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 4, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 1, 2005 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Nov 3, 2004 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 12, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 30, 2004 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Apr 16, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Apr 5, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 1, 2004 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 1, 2004 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Nov 5, 2003 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 6, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 1, 2003 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Apr 1, 2003 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jan 7, 2003 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 18, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Oct 30, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 23, 2002 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Sep 16, 2002 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jun 13, 2002 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| May 29, 2002 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 27, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 21, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 20, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |