Drawing for DD COMPACT DISC

USPTO serial 76300353

DD COMPACT DISC

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
WAHLBERG, STACY B
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with DD COMPACT DISC?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

WILLIAM T ELLIS

WILLIAM T ELLIS FOLEY & LARDNER3000 K ST NW STE 500WASHINGTON, DC 20007-5143UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009ELECTRIC APPARATUS FOR RECORDING, REPRODUCING, AMPLIFYING AND PROCESSING SOUND, IMAGES AND DATA, NAMELY COMPACT DISC PLAYERS, COMPACT DISC RECORDERS, DIGITAL VIDEO DISC PLAYERS, DIGITAL VIDEO DISC RECORDERS, CD-ROM PLAYERS, CD-ROM RECORDERS, DVD PLAYERS, DVD RECORDERS; BLANK COMPACT DISCS BLACK CD-ROM DISCS AND BLANK DVD DISCS; DATA PROCESSORS; COMPUTERS; COMPUTER DISC DRIVESACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 23, 2003ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED—
Jan 9, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jan 9, 2003UNPRUNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED—
Jan 3, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 3, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jul 3, 2002CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 21, 20021.BDSec. 1(B) CLAIM DELETED—
May 21, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 15, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 19, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 30, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance