USPTO serial 76300409
RUBYFRUIT BAR & GRILL EST. 1994
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- KING, LINDA M
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with RUBYFRUIT BAR & GRILL EST. 1994?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Michael J. Zinna
MICHAEL J ZINNA WARD & OLIVO382 SPRINGFIELD AVESUMMIT, NJ 07901UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | Restaurant and bar services | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 12, 2005 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Jan 12, 2005 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Jan 12, 2005 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Sep 9, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Feb 2, 2004 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Feb 2, 2004 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Feb 2, 2004 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Sep 24, 2003 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Feb 21, 2003 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 7, 2003 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 18, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 30, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 12, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 8, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 29, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 29, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 1, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 21, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |