USPTO serial 76300461
TACK
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 2952174Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- May 17, 2005
- Examiner
- AIKENS, RONALD E
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with TACK?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Parker H. Bagley
PARKER H BAGLEY MILBANK, TWEED, HADLEY & MCCLOY1 CHASE MANHATTAN PLZ FL 47NEW YORK, NY 10005-1413UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 020 | Furniture, namely, chests of drawers; desks; tables; chairs; seats; mirrors; shoe cabinets; bookstands; lockers; curtain rods and curtain rails; plastic fasteners; non-metal fasteners, namely, nails, wedges, nuts, screws, bolts, rivets, and casters; non-electric locks, not of metal; non-metal folding boxes; cushions and Japanese sitting cushions; pillows; mattresses; picture frames; non-metal ladders and step ladders; non-metal toolboxes; rattan blinds; decorative bead curtains; non-metal towel dispensers; single leaf screens; folding screens; non-metal nameplates and door plates; benches; non-metal hooks for clothing, hats, keys and curtain sashes; non-metal letterboxes; cradles for infants; walkers for infants; ladies' hairdressers' chairs; barbers' chairs | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | May 18, 2001 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 23, 2011 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| May 17, 2005 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Mar 18, 2005 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 11, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 8, 2005 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Aug 2, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jul 26, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 26, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 16, 2004 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 12, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 10, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 15, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 1, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jul 17, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 11, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 10, 2003 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jun 10, 2003 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| May 21, 2003 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| May 21, 2003 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| May 21, 2003 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| May 21, 2003 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Dec 3, 2002 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Sep 10, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 21, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jul 3, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 28, 2002 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jun 3, 2002 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Mar 14, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 8, 2002 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Feb 25, 2002 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Dec 10, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 26, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 19, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |