USPTO serial 76300518
THERMO VET
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 2989921Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Aug 30, 2005
- Examiner
- BRADLEY, EVELYN
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with THERMO VET?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
THERMOSURGERY TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
Phoenix, AZ
THERMOSURGERY TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
Phoenix, AZ
THERMOSURGERY TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
Phoenix, AZ
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
C. Robert von Hellens
C ROBERT VON HELLENS CAHILL SUTTON & THOMAS PLC155 PARK ONE2141 E HIGHLAND AVEPHOENIX, AZ 85016Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | DISTRIBUTORSHIP SERVICES AND MARKETING SERVICES IN THE FIELD OF MEDICAL EQUIPMENT FOR TREATING ANIMALS | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Apr 30, 2004 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by THERMOSURGERY TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by THERMOSURGERY TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by THERMOSURGERY TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Similar marks named THERMO VET
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 6, 2012 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Aug 30, 2005 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jul 15, 2005 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 8, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 5, 2005 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Jun 16, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 2, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 2, 2005 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 14, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 13, 2004 | CNRT | SU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 4, 2004 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Oct 7, 2004 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Oct 7, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 31, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Mar 24, 2004 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 23, 2004 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Mar 23, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 4, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 9, 2003 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 23, 2003 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Sep 23, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 2, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 22, 2003 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 31, 2003 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Mar 31, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 8, 2002 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jul 16, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 26, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Apr 10, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 25, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 28, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 21, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |