USPTO serial 76300539
CELLOMICS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- GOLD, BARBARA
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with CELLOMICS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
David S. Harper
DAVID S HARPER MCDONNELL, BOEHNEN, HULBERT & BERGHOFF300 S WACKER DR STE 3200CHICAGO, IL 60606-6709UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computerized cell screening system, comprising, optical light microscopes, optical detectors, wavelength selection devices namely, filter wheels and sliders, light modulators, namely, shutters and diaphragms, microscope objectives, motorized mounts, optical imaging detectors, namely, CCD cameras, environmental control chambers, and automated pipettes; computer hardware, namely, scanning computer hardware, and controllers for driving optical and mechanical components of the cell screening system; computer software for use in conducting cell-based analysis by optical methods | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by CARL ZEISS JENA GMBH
- Other trademarks owned by Cellomics, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Cellomics, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by CELLOMICS, INC.
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Similar marks named CELLOMICS
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 26, 2005 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 26, 2005 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Feb 23, 2005 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 18, 2005 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Feb 18, 2005 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 24, 2004 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 20, 2004 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Aug 20, 2004 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 18, 2004 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 28, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Apr 28, 2004 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 18, 2004 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Feb 18, 2004 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 7, 2003 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 18, 2003 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Aug 18, 2003 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 11, 2003 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 19, 2003 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Aug 20, 2002 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| May 28, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 8, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 8, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 7, 2002 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Oct 23, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 23, 2001 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Oct 23, 2001 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 28, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 27, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |