USPTO serial 76300626
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
ROBERT B. CHICKERING
DIANE J MASON DORSEY & WHITNEY LLP555 CALIFORNIA ST STE 1000SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94104-1513UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 005 | herbicides and insecticides for agricultural and domestic use | ABANDONED | Dec 13, 2000 |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 12, 2006 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Oct 12, 2006 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Jul 10, 2006 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| May 9, 2003 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Feb 24, 2003 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 21, 2003 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 1, 2003 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Oct 31, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 21, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 25, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 9, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 31, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 21, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 20, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |