Drawing for SHEYENNE VALLEY BRAND

USPTO serial 76300769

SHEYENNE VALLEY BRAND

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 614
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
STRZYZ, KAREN
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SHEYENNE VALLEY BRAND?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
029MEAT, PROCESSED MEAT, PROCESSED SEAFOOD, LUNCHEON MEATS AND MEAT PASTES PRIMARILY CONSISTING OF BEEF, BISON, LAMB, MUTTON, GOAT, ELK, VEAL, AND POULTRY, CANNED SOUPS, CANNED MEAT, CANNED POULTRY, DRY AND PROCESSED LENTILS, DRY AND PROCESSED PEAS; DRY AND PROCESSED BEANS, ALL OF WHICH IS PROCESSED ACCORDING TO ISLAMIC REQUIREMENTSACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 17, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
May 7, 2004PETDPETITION TO REVIVE-DENIED—
Dec 15, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Dec 4, 2003PINMINCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED—
Aug 20, 2003PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED—
Aug 4, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jun 3, 2003ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Oct 7, 2002CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 4, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 10, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 21, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 2, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 22, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance