Drawing for AFFINITYEXPRESS

USPTO serial 76300784

AFFINITYEXPRESS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
STIGLITZ, SUSAN R
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with AFFINITYEXPRESS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Christopher H. Martin

CHRISTOPHER H MARTIN HEMENWAY & BARNES60 STATE STBOSTON, MA 02109-1800UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035Electronic retailing services via computer in the field of clothing, headgear, decorative garment patches, and souvenir itemsACTIVEMar 13, 2001
040Manufacture of clothing, headgear, decorative garment patches, and souvenir items to order and/or specification of others; manufacture of general product lines in the field of clothing, headgear, decorative garment patches, and souvenir items to the order and specification of othersACTIVEMar 13, 2001

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 13, 2003EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Jul 31, 2003EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Apr 26, 2003ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Apr 26, 2003EXFBEXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF—
Jan 16, 2003EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Jan 9, 2003EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Jun 17, 2002CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Apr 30, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 30, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Apr 25, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 25, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 23, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance