USPTO serial 76300794
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Starbucks U.S. Brands Corporation
Burlingame, CA
Starbucks U.S. Brands Corporation
Burlingame, CA
MINDEN, NV
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
JULIA ANNE MATHESON
JULIA ANNE MATHESON FINNEGAN HENDERSON FARABOW GARRETT901 NEW YORK AVE NWWASHINGTON, DC 20001-4413UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | flavored milk, milk based food beverages, excluding milkshakes, and non-carbonated milk-based soft drinks; flavoring syrups and liquid and powdered beverage mixes used to make milk-based food beverages | ACTIVE | — |
| 030 | coffee and espresso beverages, beverages made with a base of coffee and/or espresso, milkshakes, ice cream, sherbet, sorbet, flavored ices and frozen confections | ACTIVE | — |
| 032 | carbonated and non-carbonated soft drinks; flavoring syrups and liquid and powdered mixes used to make carbonated and non-carbonated soft drinks | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 29, 2006 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Sep 27, 2005 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 27, 2005 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 28, 2005 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 12, 2005 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Jan 12, 2005 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Aug 10, 2004 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 23, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jul 12, 2004 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jul 12, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 26, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 18, 2004 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 18, 2004 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jan 14, 2004 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jan 14, 2004 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 14, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 13, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 7, 2003 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 14, 2003 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jul 14, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 14, 2003 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jan 6, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 22, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 2, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 9, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 28, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 28, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 27, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 22, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |