Drawing for STARBUCKS DOUBLESHOT

USPTO serial 76300794

STARBUCKS DOUBLESHOT

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
EULIN, INGRID C
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with STARBUCKS DOUBLESHOT?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

JULIA ANNE MATHESON

JULIA ANNE MATHESON FINNEGAN HENDERSON FARABOW GARRETT901 NEW YORK AVE NWWASHINGTON, DC 20001-4413UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
029flavored milk, milk based food beverages, excluding milkshakes, and non-carbonated milk-based soft drinks; flavoring syrups and liquid and powdered beverage mixes used to make milk-based food beveragesACTIVE—
030coffee and espresso beverages, beverages made with a base of coffee and/or espresso, milkshakes, ice cream, sherbet, sorbet, flavored ices and frozen confectionsACTIVE—
032carbonated and non-carbonated soft drinks; flavoring syrups and liquid and powdered mixes used to make carbonated and non-carbonated soft drinksACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 29, 2006ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Sep 27, 2005MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Sep 27, 2005ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jan 28, 2005EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Jan 12, 2005EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Jan 12, 2005EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Aug 10, 2004EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Jul 23, 2004CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Jul 12, 2004EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Jul 12, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Apr 26, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 18, 2004EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Feb 18, 2004DPCCDIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Jan 14, 2004EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Jan 14, 2004DRRRDIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED—
Jan 14, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jan 13, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Aug 7, 2003EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Jul 14, 2003EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Jul 14, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jan 14, 2003NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jan 6, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Oct 22, 2002PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Oct 2, 2002NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Aug 9, 2002CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Mar 28, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 28, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 27, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 22, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance