USPTO serial 76300835
AUTOLEAD
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- AIKENS, RONALD E
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with AUTOLEAD?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
St. Catharines, Ontario, CA
AMERSHAM BIOSCIENCES NIAGARA, INC.
ST. CATHARINES, ONTARIO L2S 3A1, CA
Other trademarks owned by AMERSHAM BIOSCIENCES NIAGARA, INC.
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Paul Herbert
PAUL HERBERT RICHES, MCKENZIE & HERBERT LLPSTE 2900 2 BLOOR ST ETORONTO, ON M4W 3J5CANADAGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | an automated system comprising hardware and software for measurements of particles, cells and organisms in the life sciences field and material sciences field | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 21, 2004 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 24, 2004 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 7, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| May 6, 2003 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 10, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 10, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 6, 2003 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 3, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 25, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 26, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 26, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 23, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |