USPTO serial 76300952
IQEYE3
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- KAZAZIAN, MICHAEL H
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 113 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with IQEYE3?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Santa Ana Heights, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
ELLSWORTH R ROSTON
ELLSWORTH R ROSTON FULWIDER PATTON LEE & UTECHT, LLPHOWARD HUGHES CTR6060 CTR DR TENTH FLLOS ANGELES, CA 90045Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | COMPUTERIZED DIGITAL CAMERAS FOR USE IN SECURITY AND SURVEILLANCE APPLICATIONS | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 18, 2006 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Jan 12, 2006 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Oct 7, 2005 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Oct 7, 2005 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Jun 17, 2005 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Jun 16, 2005 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 20, 2005 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Mar 1, 2005 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Feb 28, 2005 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Aug 20, 2004 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 13, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jul 6, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 6, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 9, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 17, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Aug 7, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 12, 2002 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 12, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 30, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 4, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 4, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 15, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 23, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |