Drawing for BRIDGET JONES

USPTO serial 76301000

BRIDGET JONES

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
MAHONEY, PAULA M
Law office
INTENT TO USE UNIT

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with BRIDGET JONES?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

MEYER A. GROSS

MEYER A GROSS SCHWEITZER CORNMAN GROSS & BONDELL LLP292 MADISON AVE FL 19NEW YORK, NY 10017-6307UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
038Providing on-line chat rooms for transmission of messages among computer users concerning dating, lifestyle, and health and well beingACTIVE—
041Entertainment services, namely, providing information in the field of dating, lifestyle, health and well being, and commentary and articles about the aforesaid, all on-line via a global computer networkACTIVE—
045Dating services and computer dating servicesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 27, 2005MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Sep 27, 2005ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 1, 2004EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Nov 15, 2004EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Nov 15, 2004EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
May 25, 2004EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
May 20, 2004CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
May 13, 2004EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
May 13, 2004EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Dec 18, 2003EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Nov 20, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Nov 18, 2003EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Jun 18, 2003EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
May 21, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
May 19, 2003EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Nov 19, 2002NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Aug 27, 2002PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Aug 7, 2002NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jun 2, 2002CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Apr 1, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 1, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance