Drawing for VIRGIN EXTRAS

USPTO serial 76301010

VIRGIN EXTRAS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
AXILBUND, MELVIN
Law office
DIVISIONAL UNIT

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with VIRGIN EXTRAS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

James W. Dabnev

CARRIE B KINGSLEY FRIED FRANK HARRIS SHRIVER & JACOBSON LLONE NEW YORK PLZNEW YORK, NY 10004UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Mobile telephones, telephones and modems, and accessories therefor, namely, batteries, battery chargers, cigarette lighter adapters, dashboard mounts, hands-free headsets, carrying cases and belt clips; computer software downloadable from the internet for transmission, reception and storage of voice, data, images, e-mail and digital informationACTIVE—
035Providing directory information via telephoneACTIVE—
038Telecommunications services, namely, transmission of voice, data, images, audio, video, and information via telephone or the internet; personal communications services; pager services; electronic mail services; transmission or broadcast of news and information for others via telephone, including the internetACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 2, 2009ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Nov 25, 2009ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Feb 2, 2005MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Feb 2, 2005ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Nov 9, 2004TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Apr 14, 2004CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Apr 5, 2004EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Apr 5, 2004EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Apr 5, 2004EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jan 22, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Oct 7, 2003NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jul 15, 2003PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jun 25, 2003NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
May 15, 2003CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
May 23, 2002CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Apr 30, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 30, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Oct 31, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 25, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 23, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance