USPTO serial 76301023
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Daniel Kirshner
199 RTE 18E BRUNSWICK, NJ 08816-1413UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 018 | ATHLETIC BAGS, ATTACHE CASES, BABY CARRIERS WORN ON THE BODY, BACKPACKS, BEACH BAGS, BEACH UMBRELLAS, BILLFOLDS, BOOK BAGS, BRIEFCASE-TYPE PORTFOLIOS, BRIEFCASES, BUSINESS CARD CASES, CARRY-ON BAGS, NON-MOTORIZED COLLAPSIBLE LUGGAGE CARTS, CHANGE PURSES, CLUTCH BAGS, CLUTCH PURSES, COSMETIC CASES SOLD EMPTY, CREDIT CARD CASES, DIAPER BAGS, DOCUMENT CASES, DRAWSTRING POUCHES, DUFFLE BAGS, FANNY PACKS, FELT POUCHES, GARMENT BAGS FOR TRAVEL, GYM BAGS, HANDBAGS, HAT BOXES FOR TRAVEL, KEY CASES, KNAPSACKS, LUGGAGE, OVERNIGHT BAGS, OVERNIGHT CASES, PARASOLS, PATIO UMBRELLAS, POCKETBOOKS, PURSES, SATCHELS, SCHOOL BAGS, SHOE BAGS FOR TRAVEL, LEATHER SHOPPING BAGS, MESH SHOPPING BAGS, TEXTILE SHOPPING BAGS, SHOULDER BAGS, ALL-PURPOSE SPORTS BAGS, SUITCASES, TOILETRY CASES SOLD EMPTY, TOTE BAGS, TRAVEL BAGS, TRUNKS FOR TRAVELING, UMBRELLAS, VALISES, VANITY CASES SOLD EMPTY, WAIST PACKS, WALKING CANES FOR NON-MEDICAL PURPOSES, AND WALLETS | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 5, 2003 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 7, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 2, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 5, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 1, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 27, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |