CopyMark Law Group
4.9/5
Drawing for OCAS-SELECT

USPTO serial 76301194

OCAS-SELECT

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
CHICOSKI, JENNIFER D
Law office
DIVISIONAL UNIT

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with OCAS-SELECT?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Trademark Monitoring
(312) 319-4460
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Start a new application
(312) 319-4460

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Martin F. Majestic

MARTIN F MAJESTIC ESQ HANSON BRIDGETT MARCUS VLAHOS & RUDY LLP333 MARKET ST 21ST FLMFM-23SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94105-2173

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
005Pharmaceutical preparations, namely, a hydrogel preparation capable of releasing a drug either immediately or for a prolonged period of time after a specified delay in initial drug release; diagnostic preparations for clinical or medical laboratory use; nutritional and dietary supplementsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 10, 2005MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
May 10, 2005ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Oct 20, 2004TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jul 29, 2004EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Jul 13, 2004CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Jul 1, 2004EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Jul 1, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jan 2, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Dec 31, 2003EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Dec 31, 2003EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Jul 25, 2003EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Jul 3, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jun 30, 2003EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Mar 28, 2003EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Jan 6, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jan 2, 2003EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Jul 2, 2002NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Apr 9, 2002PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Mar 20, 2002NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Oct 15, 2001CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Sep 30, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 21, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance