Drawing for SWISS LADY

USPTO serial 76301201

SWISS LADY

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
VERHOSEK, WILLIAM T
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 604: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with SWISS LADY?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Kathleen A. Skinner

KATHLEEN A SKINNER BEESON SKINNER BEVERLY, LLP1 KAISER PLZ STE 2360OAKLAND, CA 94612-3613UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
008Cutlery, namely, pocket knives, sports knives and parts thereof and boxes and cases therefor for displaying the goods and for use in gift setsABANDONED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 2, 2004ABN4ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION—
Feb 2, 2004OP.TOPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999—
Feb 2, 2004OP.TOPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999—
Feb 2, 2004OP.SOPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999—
Feb 21, 2003OP.IOPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999—
Dec 11, 2002ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
Oct 29, 2002PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Oct 9, 2002NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Aug 14, 2002CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jul 23, 2002CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Jul 22, 2002REINREINSTATED—
Jul 19, 20021.BDSec. 1(B) CLAIM DELETED—
Jul 11, 2002ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Mar 28, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 28, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Sep 28, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 27, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance