USPTO serial 76301216
POWERHOUSE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MULLEN, MARK
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with POWERHOUSE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
BRUCE E. PEACOCK
JOHN M SKERIOTIS BROUSE MCDOWELL388 S MAIN ST STE 500AKRON, OH 44311-4407UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Retail lawn and garden stores for sales limited to power-operated lawn and garden equipment, namely, riding mowers, leaf shredders, lawn vacuums, walk-behind mowers, self propelled mowers, side discharge mowers, convertible mowers, rear discharge mowers, side discharge, high wheel mowers, mulching mowers, electric mowers, chipper/shredders, front and rear tine tiller, edgers, log splitters, snow throwers, two-stage snow throwers, track drive snow throwers and services parts for all the foregoing | ACTIVE | — |
| 037 | Maintenance and repair of power-operated lawn and garden equipment, namely, riding mowers, leaf shredders, lawn vacuums, walk-behind mowers, self propelled mowers, side discharge mowers, convertible mowers, rear discharge mowers, side discharge, high wheel mowers, mulching mowers, electric mowers, chipper/shredders, front and rear tine tillers, edgers, log splitters, snow throwers, two-stage snow throwers, track drive snow throwers | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 7, 2007 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 7, 2007 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Feb 26, 2007 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 13, 2007 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Dec 31, 2006 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Dec 31, 2006 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jan 9, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 3, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 11, 2003 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Sep 3, 2002 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 30, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 10, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Apr 29, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 25, 2002 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Dec 5, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 29, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 28, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |