Drawing for CREATIVE COOKIE

USPTO serial 76301290

CREATIVE COOKIE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
CARTY, GEORGIA
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with CREATIVE COOKIE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Sherry H. Flax

SHERRY H FLAX SAUL EWING LLP100 S CHARLES STBALTIMORE, MD 21201-2725UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
030fortune cookiesACTIVEDec 1, 1979

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 5, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 30, 2004CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Mar 27, 2004ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Mar 27, 2004EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Mar 27, 2004EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Nov 26, 2003EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED—
Jul 8, 2003CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED—
May 8, 2003JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Feb 24, 2003CNCFCONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED—
Dec 9, 2002JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Dec 9, 2002EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Dec 4, 2002EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Nov 14, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 14, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
May 22, 2002CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Mar 15, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 15, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Oct 1, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 27, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance