Drawing for STOP THE INSANITY

USPTO serial 76301304

STOP THE INSANITY

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
KEATING, MICHAEL P
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with STOP THE INSANITY?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Zachary A. Wright

ZACHARY A WRIGHT SHORT CRESSMAN & BURGESS PLLC999 THIRD AVE STE 3000SEATTLE, WA 98104UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
003Non-medicated skin care and beauty care products, namely, face cream, hand cream, eye cream, gels, lotions and moisturizers; and aromatherapy products, namely, aromatherapy oils, aromatheapy creams, aromatherapy lotions, aromatherapy gels, aromatherapy soaps, aromatherapy powders, and aromatherapy liquids; and non-medicated personal care products, namely, soaps, bath gel, shower gel, hair gel, shampoo, and conditionerACTIVE—
005Dietary supplementsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ABN6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 6, 2004ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
May 27, 2003NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Mar 4, 2003PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Feb 12, 2003NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Dec 12, 2002CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Dec 11, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 6, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 6, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jun 7, 2002CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
May 17, 2002ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
May 16, 2002CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Apr 1, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 1, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 29, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance