USPTO serial 76301407
SEVENTEEN
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- REIHNER, DAVID
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with SEVENTEEN?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Baila H. Celedonia
BAILA H CELEDONIA COWAN, LIEBOWITZ & LATMAN, PC1133 AVE OF THE AMERICASNEW YORK, NY 10036-6710UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | COSMETICS; PERFUMES, COLOGNE, DEODORANT, TOILET WATER AND AFTER SHAVE LOTION; HAIR CARE PRODUCTS, NAMELY, HAIR CONDITIONERS, HAIR CLEANING PREPARATIONS, SHAMPOOS, HAIR SPRAY, HAIR GEL, MOUSSE, HAIR COLORING PREPARATIONS, HAIR LIGHTENERS, HAIR BLEACHING PREPARATIONS, HAIR DYE, HAIR STRAIGHTENING PREPARATIONS, HAIR RELAXING PREPARATIONS, ANTIFRIZZ LOTION FOR HAIR, HAIR PROTECTING PREPARATIONS; SKIN CARE PRODUCTS, NAMELY, SKIN CLEANING PREPARATIONS, SKIN SOAP, SKIN MOISTURIZER, SKIN MASKS, ACNE CREAM, SKIN CLARIFIERS, ACNE PADS, SKIN CLEANING PADS, NOSE STRIPS, SKIN TONERS, SKIN CREAMS, EYE CREAM, EYE AND SKIN MAKEUP REMOVERS; NAIL CARE PREPARATIONS, NAMELY, NAIL POLISH, NAIL POLISH REMOVER, NAIL CONDITIONER, POLISH BASE COAT, NAIL POLISH TOP COAT, NAIL CREAM, CUTICLE CREAM, CUTICLE OIL, DECALS, ARTIFICIAL FINGER NAILS, NAIL GELS, NAIL GLUE, NAIL TIPS, GEL SOLUTION, SILK WRAPS AND NAIL GEL; COTTON PUFFS, COTTON STICKS, COTTON SWABS, ALL FOR COSMETIC PURPOSES | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 24, 2004 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Aug 6, 2003 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 11, 2003 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jul 11, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 14, 2003 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Oct 22, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 2, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 1, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 11, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 11, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 3, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 18, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 10, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 10, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 4, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 12, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 12, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 10, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 16, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |