USPTO serial 76301423
NIKOTEL
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- RAUEN, JAMES
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with NIKOTEL?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
San Diego, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Guy D. Yale
GUY D YALE ALIX, YALE & RISTAS, LLP750 MAIN STHARTFORD, CT 06103-2703UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Data processors and computers; apparatus for recording, transmitting and reproducing data, sound and images, namely telephones, modems, cellular telephones, computer monitors, computer terminals, video screens, video monitors | ACTIVE | — |
| 028 | Games, namely hand held unit for playing electronic games | ACTIVE | — |
| 038 | Telephone communication services; telecommunications services, namely providing fiber optic network services; telecommunication services, namely ISDN services via fiber optic networks; telecommunications services, namely personal communications services via fiber optic networks; providing multiple user dedicated access to the internet via fiber optic networks; television transmission services via fiber optic networks; mobile radio telephone services; electronic transmission of messages and data; rental of telecommunication equipment in general; paging services; transmission of information via satellite; information services concerning telecommunication; and an online computer database in the field of telecommunications | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Computer programming for data processing for others; updating of computer software for others; rental and maintenance of computer software | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by nikotel, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 028
- Other trademarks in Class 038
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named NIKOTEL
- Prosecution event ABN2 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 3, 2004 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 26, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 7, 2003 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 19, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 17, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 17, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 9, 2002 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 12, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 29, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 24, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 13, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |