Drawing for SUPERIOR QUALITY

USPTO serial 76301434

SUPERIOR QUALITY

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
DAWE III, WILLIAM H
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 108 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SUPERIOR QUALITY?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Gene S. Winter

GENE S WINTERST ONGE STEWARD JOHNSTON986 BEDFORD ST STE 1STAMFORD, CT 06905-5619

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
026BUTTONS FOR CLOTHESACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 13, 2005MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Sep 13, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 7, 2005EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Jun 8, 2005EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED—
Jan 10, 2005CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED—
Jan 9, 2005CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED—
Jan 5, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 10, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Nov 10, 2004JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Aug 19, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jul 6, 2004CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Jun 28, 2004CNCFCONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED—
May 20, 2003JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Jan 15, 2003EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Jan 8, 2003EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Dec 18, 2002ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Oct 23, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 17, 2002CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
May 6, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 6, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Nov 5, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 28, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance