Drawing for CUMBRE

USPTO serial 76301458

CUMBRE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
SMITH, BRIDGETT G
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with CUMBRE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

T. LING CHWANG

T LING CHWANG JACKSON WALKER LLP2435 N CENTRAL EXPRESSWAY STE 600RICHARDSON, TX 75080UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
005Antimicrobial pharmaceutical preparationsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 26, 2006MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jul 26, 2006ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Nov 25, 2005EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED—
Oct 24, 2005EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED—
Oct 24, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Apr 26, 2005EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Apr 26, 2005EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Apr 26, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Nov 5, 2004EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Oct 18, 2004EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Oct 18, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
May 5, 2004EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
May 3, 2004CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
May 3, 2004CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Apr 26, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Apr 21, 2004EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Jun 18, 2003EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Jun 10, 2003EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Jun 10, 2003EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
May 20, 2003NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Feb 25, 2003PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Feb 5, 2003NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Dec 26, 2002CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Dec 20, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 6, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 8, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 28, 2002TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Feb 28, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 1, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 22, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance