USPTO serial 76301508
G-NET
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- STINE, DAVID
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with G-NET?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
EDWARD A. SOKOLSKI
EDWARD A SOKOLSKI THE LAW OFFICE OF EDWARD A SOKOLSKI3868 W CARSON ST STE 105TORRANCE, CA 90503-6706UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 041 | CABLE AND SATELLITE TELEVISION PROGRAMMING SERVICES IN THE FIELD OF TV VIDEO GAMES AND INTERACTIVE TELEVISION; AND PROVIDING ONLINE VIDEO GAMES AND INFORMATION RELATED TO VIDEO GAMES VIA A WEBSITE ON A GLOBAL COMPUTER NETWORK | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 29, 2004 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jul 29, 2004 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Apr 29, 2004 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Apr 29, 2004 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Dec 22, 2003 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Oct 29, 2003 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Oct 29, 2003 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Aug 18, 2003 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Jul 22, 2003 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 12, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 12, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 12, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 14, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 14, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 18, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 18, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 15, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 28, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |