Drawing for REAL TIME ESLI

USPTO serial 76301522

REAL TIME ESLI

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
LORENZO, ROBERT
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with REAL TIME ESLI?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Lawrence E. Abelman

LAWRENCE E ABELMAN ABELMAN FRAYNE & SCHWAB666 3RD AVE 10TH FLNEW YORK, NY 10017UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
001CHEMICALLY TREATED INDICATORS TO SIGNAL SATURATION LEVELS OF FILTER MEDIA OF GAS AND VAPOR CARTRIDGES WHICH CARTRIDGES ARE USED WITH AIR PURIFYING RESPIRATORS USED TO PROTECT WORKERS AGAINST INHALATION OF GAS AND VAPORSACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 9, 2008ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Sep 12, 2007ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Jan 3, 2007ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Sep 19, 2006EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Sep 19, 2006MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Sep 19, 2006ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Apr 6, 2006CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
Feb 7, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jan 17, 2006NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Oct 25, 2005PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Oct 5, 2005NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jul 14, 2005PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jul 1, 2005ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jun 29, 2005CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
Jun 28, 2005CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jun 28, 2005CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Jun 21, 2005ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Jun 10, 2005CWBPWITHDRAWN BEFORE PUBLICATION—
Apr 6, 2005PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Apr 1, 2005ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Mar 30, 2005CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Mar 16, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 15, 2004CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Mar 9, 2004JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Mar 9, 2004EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Feb 20, 2004EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Jan 26, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jul 18, 2003CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
May 1, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 1, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 10, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 5, 2001ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Sep 30, 2001CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance