Drawing for ADERIS PHARMACEUTICALS

USPTO serial 76302049

ADERIS PHARMACEUTICALS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
FLETCHER, TRACY L
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with ADERIS PHARMACEUTICALS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

ANNA T. KWAN

ANNA T KWAN LATHAM & WATKINS650 TOWN CTR DR STE 2000COSTA MESA, CA 92626-1925UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
005Pharmaceuticals preparations in the field of cardiovascular and renal therapeuticsACTIVE—
035Wholesale distributorship featuring cardiovascular and renal therapeuticsACTIVE—
040Manufacture of product lines in the field of cardiovascular and renal therapeuticsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 17, 2005MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Nov 17, 2005ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Apr 6, 2005EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Mar 22, 2005TPEXSOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION—
Mar 22, 2005PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Mar 22, 2005PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Mar 11, 2005EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Nov 30, 2004EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Nov 8, 2004TPEXSOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION—
Nov 8, 2004PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Nov 8, 2004PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Sep 11, 2004EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Aug 9, 2004CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Apr 22, 2004DPCCDIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Apr 9, 2004DRRRDIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED—
Apr 9, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Mar 26, 2004EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Mar 11, 2004EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Mar 11, 2004EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Sep 11, 2003EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Aug 21, 2003EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Aug 21, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Mar 11, 2003NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Dec 17, 2002PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Nov 27, 2002NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Oct 19, 2002CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jun 18, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 5, 2002CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jun 5, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 11, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jan 30, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 2, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 29, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance