Drawing for ROME LAS VEGAS COLOSSEUM

USPTO serial 76302255

ROME LAS VEGAS COLOSSEUM

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 605
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
BELLO, ZACK
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with ROME LAS VEGAS COLOSSEUM?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

John H. Oltman

MELVIN K SILVERMAN MELVIN K. SILVERMAN AND ASSOCS, PC500500 W CYPRESS CRK RDFT LAUDERDALE, FL 33309

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035Resort hotels, casinos and theme parks business management and product merchandising servicesABANDONED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 4, 2003ABN5ABANDONMENT - AFTER PUBLICATION—
May 20, 2003PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Apr 30, 2003NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Apr 14, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Apr 1, 2003TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Mar 23, 2003CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Mar 21, 2003IUAAUSE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED—
Mar 19, 2003AUPCAMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Feb 21, 2003IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED—
Feb 21, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 21, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Oct 22, 2002CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 26, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 23, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 23, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Dec 6, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 9, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 23, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance