USPTO serial 76302304
QFC QUALITY FOOD CENTERS ADVANTAGE CARD
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jul 1, 2003
- Examiner
- ZAK, HENRY
- Law office
- POST REGISTRATION
What this means
Status 702 means the registration is active, Section 8 was accepted, and a Section 15 declaration of incontestability was also accepted. Incontestability strengthens your rights by limiting certain challenges after five years of continuous use. Continue use in commerce and plan for the 10-year Section 8 and 9 renewal.
Need help with QFC QUALITY FOOD CENTERS ADVANTAGE CARD?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
PORTLAND, OR
Bellevue, WA
Bellevue, WA
Bellevue, WA
BELLEVUE, WA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Richard L. Kirkpatrick
Ariana Gallisa Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLPCalendar/Docketing DepartmentP.O. BOX 2824San Francisco, CA 94126-2824Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | RETAIL STORE SERVICES IN THE FIELD OF GROCERIES, FOOD PRODUCTS AND SUNDRIES FEATURING A BONUS INCENTIVE PROGRAM FOR CUSTOMERS | ACTIVE | May 1, 2002 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by FRED MEYER STORES, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by Quality Food Centers, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Quality Food Centers, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Quality Food Centers, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by QUALITY FOOD CENTERS, INC.
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Similar marks named QFC QUALITY FOOD CENTERS ADVANTAGE CARD
- Prosecution event ARAA explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 23, 2008 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 23, 2008 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 20, 2008 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Oct 20, 2008 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 10, 2008 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Sep 10, 2008 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| Sep 9, 2008 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 14, 2008 | C7.. | CANCELLED SECTION 7-TOTAL | — |
| Jul 14, 2008 | PLGL | ASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL | — |
| Jul 1, 2008 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| May 13, 2008 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| May 7, 2008 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 7, 2008 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 1, 2003 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| May 5, 2003 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Apr 11, 2003 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Mar 27, 2003 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 12, 2003 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Feb 12, 2003 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Oct 8, 2002 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jul 16, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 26, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 1, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 29, 2002 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Apr 26, 2002 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Jan 14, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 9, 2002 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Dec 6, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 12, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 28, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |