USPTO serial 76302336
VEGA WAVE SYSTEMS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- FAINT, MARY CATHERINE
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with VEGA WAVE SYSTEMS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
John F. Letchford
JOHN F LETCHFORD KLEHR HARRISON HARVEY BRANZBURG ET AL260 S BROAD STPHILADELPHIA, PA 19102-5021UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Components and equipment used in optical communications systems, namely, optical transmitters, optical receivers, optical modulators, optical switches, integrated optical circuits and systems; components and equipment used in wireless communications systems, namely, transistors and integrated circuits for radio-frequency amplifiers, oscillators, filters, mixers, transmitters, receivers | ACTIVE | — |
| 040 | Manufacture of optical and wireless communications components and equipment to the specifications and orders of others | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Design of optical and wireless communications components and equipment for others | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 27, 2004 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Mar 24, 2004 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Feb 24, 2004 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Feb 24, 2004 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Aug 18, 2003 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Jun 26, 2003 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jun 18, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 17, 2003 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jun 4, 2003 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| May 29, 2003 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Oct 25, 2002 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 7, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 19, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 10, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 1, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 25, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |