USPTO serial 76302509
HCX
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- COWARD, JEFFERY
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with HCX?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
FT. LAUDERDALE, FL
haircolorxpress International, LLC
Ft. Lauderdale, FL
Other trademarks owned by haircolorxpress International, LLC
haircolorxpress International, LLC
Ft. Lauderdale, FL
Other trademarks owned by haircolorxpress International, LLC
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
James A. Ullman
JOSEPH C WASCH4850 W PROSPECT RDFORT LAUDERDALE, FL 33309UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | full line of hair color preparations, namely hair dyes, hair bleaching preparations, hair color removers; a full line of non-medicated hair care styling preparations, namely, shampoo, conditioner, styling spray, gels, and hair spray; a full line of non-medicated skin care preparations, namely, foundation, powder, blush, eye shadows, eye pencils, eye liners, mascara, lipsticks and lip gloss | ABANDONED | Feb 21, 2001 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by HCX SALONS INTERNATIONAL, LLC
- Other trademarks owned by haircolorxpress International, LLC
- Other trademarks owned by haircolorxpress International, LLC
- Other trademarks in Class 003
- Similar marks named HCX
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 29, 2007 | FIXD | ELECTRONIC RECORD REVIEW COMPLETE | — |
| Dec 6, 2006 | UNDN | UNDELIVERABLE MAIL - NO ACTION TAKEN | — |
| Sep 19, 2006 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 19, 2006 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 31, 2006 | UNDN | UNDELIVERABLE MAIL - NO ACTION TAKEN | — |
| Mar 31, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 29, 2006 | ERRR | ON HOLD - ELECTRONIC RECORD REVIEW REQUIRED | — |
| Mar 7, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 27, 2005 | DMCC | DATA MODIFICATION COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 27, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 17, 2005 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| May 24, 2005 | ABND | ABANDONMENT DELETED BY TTAB | — |
| May 23, 2005 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Apr 26, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 22, 2004 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 22, 2004 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Nov 26, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 22, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 30, 2003 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Sep 30, 2003 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Sep 30, 2003 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Oct 22, 2002 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Aug 20, 2002 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 9, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 19, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 21, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 30, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 14, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 2, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |