Drawing for NUCURE

USPTO serial 76302630

NUCURE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
WELLS, CHRISTOPHER
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with NUCURE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

G. Harvey Dunn III

W SCOTT BROWN VINSON & ELKINS LLP2300 FIRST CITY TWR1001 FANNIN STHOUSTON, TX 77002-6760

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
003Cosmetics, skin care, and hair care products, namely make-up, facial soaps, lipsticks, nail polish, skin moisturizers, non-medicated skin gels, skin creams, skin lotions, bath soaps, bath gels, bath oils, bubble bath, bath beads, anti-aging skin care products, namely, face creams, and non-medicated body and hand lotions, perfumes, suntan lotions, sunscreens, non-medicated lip balms, night creams, non-medicated face and eye gels, shampoo, hair conditioners, and hair spraysACTIVE—
005vitamins and nutritional supplements; medicated sunburn lotions, creams and oils; antiseptic sprays; and medicated creams for the treatment of minor burns, abrasions and aches and pains due to arthritis and bursitisACTIVE—
032Beverage products, namely fruit and vegetable juice beverages and sports drinksACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 11, 2006MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jan 11, 2006ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Apr 6, 2005EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED—
Apr 6, 2005EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED—
Apr 6, 2005EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Oct 26, 2004EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Oct 13, 2004EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Oct 13, 2004EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
May 18, 2004EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
May 11, 2004CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
May 5, 2004EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
May 5, 2004EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Apr 26, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 31, 2003EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Oct 23, 2003EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Oct 23, 2003EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Oct 6, 2003EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Oct 6, 2003REINREINSTATED—
Aug 27, 2003FAXXFAX RECEIVED—
Aug 8, 2003ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
May 5, 2003EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
May 5, 2003EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jan 31, 2003TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jan 30, 2003TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Nov 5, 2002NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Aug 13, 2002PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Aug 13, 2002PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jul 24, 2002NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
May 19, 2002CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Feb 15, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 9, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 3, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance