USPTO serial 76302802
SOLARI SODAS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- PRICE, WANDA
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with SOLARI SODAS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Casey L. Jorgensen
CASEY L JORGENSEN601 UNION ST STE 4100SEATTLE, WA 98101-2380UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 032 | BEVERAGES, NAMELY NON-ALCOHOLIC ITALIAN SODAS, FLAVORED WATERS, NON-CARBONATED WATERS, EXCLUDING DISTILLED WATERS AND MINERAL WATERS, NON-ALCOHOLIC COCKTAIL MIXERS, FRUIT DRINKS, FRUIT JUICES, AND SYRUPS AND POWDERS FOR MAKING BEVERAGES, NAMELY FRUIT DRINKS, FRUIT-FLAVORED DRINKS AND FRUIT SODAS | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 20, 2007 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 20, 2007 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Aug 31, 2007 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 6, 2007 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Jun 6, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 28, 2007 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 4, 2007 | IROA | RESPONSE TO ITU OFFICE ACTION ENTERED | — |
| Apr 4, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 5, 2007 | INCE | ITU OFFICE ACTION ISSUED FOR EXTENSION REQUEST | — |
| Dec 15, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 13, 2006 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Jul 14, 2006 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 14, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 12, 2006 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jan 11, 2006 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 12, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 9, 2005 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jun 23, 2005 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 8, 2005 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jun 8, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 14, 2004 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Sep 21, 2004 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 1, 2004 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jul 14, 2004 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 9, 2004 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Feb 17, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 10, 2004 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 10, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 4, 2004 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 4, 2004 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Jan 25, 2004 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 14, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Dec 29, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 29, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 23, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 7, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 7, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 6, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 3, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 14, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 28, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 26, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 9, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 8, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 6, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |