USPTO serial 76302804
SOLARI
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- PRICE, WANDA
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 111 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with SOLARI?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Casey L. Jorgensen
CASEY L JORGENSEN601 UNION ST STE 4100SEATTLE, WA 98101-2380UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 032 | BEVERAGES, NAMELY NON-ALCOHOLIC ITALIAN SODAS, FLAVORED WATERS, NON-CARBONATED WATERS, EXCLUDING DISTILLED WATERS AND MINERAL WATERS, NON-ALCOHOLIC COCKTAIL MIXERS, FRUIT DRINKS, FRUIT JUICES, AND SYRUPS AND POWDERS FOR MAKING BEVERAGES, NAMELY FRUIT DRINKS, FRUIT-FLAVORED DRINKS AND FRUIT SODAS | ACTIVE | Jun 1, 2007 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 28, 2008 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 28, 2008 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 28, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 27, 2007 | CNRT | SU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 24, 2007 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Aug 24, 2007 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 6, 2007 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jun 6, 2007 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Jun 6, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 28, 2007 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 4, 2007 | IROA | RESPONSE TO ITU OFFICE ACTION ENTERED | — |
| Apr 4, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 5, 2007 | INCE | ITU OFFICE ACTION ISSUED FOR EXTENSION REQUEST | — |
| Dec 15, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 13, 2006 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Jul 14, 2006 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 14, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 12, 2006 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jan 11, 2006 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 12, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 9, 2005 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jun 8, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 7, 2005 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 7, 2005 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Dec 14, 2004 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Sep 21, 2004 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 1, 2004 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jul 14, 2004 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 9, 2004 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Feb 17, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 10, 2004 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 10, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 2, 2004 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 20, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Dec 29, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 29, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 23, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 7, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 7, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 6, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 3, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 3, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 28, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 28, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 3, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |