USPTO serial 76302809
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Karin E. Peterka
KARIN E PETERKA BUCHALTER NEMER FIELDS ET AL601 S FIGUEROA ST STE 2400LOS ANGELES, CA 90017-5709UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Cinematographic movie film, video cassettes, video tapes, digital video discs, laser discs, and compact discs, all featuring various entertainment themes | ACTIVE | Jun 30, 1983 |
| 035 | Wholesale and retail ordering and distribution services featuring music, motion pictures, multimedia products, computer games and computer software, in the form of audio cassettes, videocassettes, compact discs, floppy discs for computers, digital video discs, dvd-roms, cd-roms, laser discs, and direct digital transmission over the global computer network; and wholesale and retail ordering and distribution services over the global computer network featuring the above-named products | ACTIVE | Jun 30, 1983 |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 13, 2002 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 11, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 20, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 7, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 29, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |