Drawing for FLU ALERT CENTER

USPTO serial 76302843

FLU ALERT CENTER

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 2873138Status 710
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Aug 17, 2004
Examiner
COWARD, JEFFERY
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 106

What this means

Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.

Status 710: Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active.

Need help with FLU ALERT CENTER?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Cynthia Johnson Walden

Cynthia Johnson Walden Fish & Richardson P.C.P.O. Box 1022Minneapolis, MN 55440-1022UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
042RESEARCH IN THE FIELD OF DISEASESSECTION 8 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 20, 2015CAEXCANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9—
Jan 11, 2012ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Jan 10, 2012ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 10, 2012REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Sep 30, 2011CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
Sep 30, 2011COARTEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED—
Nov 2, 2009C15AREGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK.—
Nov 2, 2009APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Oct 20, 2009E815TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED—
Oct 8, 2008ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Aug 6, 2008ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Aug 17, 2004R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
May 25, 2004PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
May 5, 2004NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Feb 17, 2004CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Feb 17, 2004IUAAUSE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED—
Feb 11, 2004AUPCAMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Feb 10, 2004IURFIU INFORMAL RESPONSE RECEIVED—
Feb 6, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Feb 4, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 4, 2004FAXXFAX RECEIVED—
Jan 29, 2004IUFFUSE AFFIDAVIT FAILED FORMALITIES—
Dec 22, 2003CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Dec 8, 2003IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED—
Dec 8, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 8, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jun 9, 2003CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 27, 2003DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 5, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 5, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Dec 3, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 7, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance