Drawing for OCEAN VALLEY

USPTO serial 76302862

OCEAN VALLEY

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
SNYDER, NELSON B
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with OCEAN VALLEY?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Gary J. Nelson

GARY J NELSON CHRISTIE, PARKER & HALE LLPP O BOX 7068PASADENA, CA 91109-7068UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
029FOOD PRODUCTS, NAMELY, MEAT; FISH; POULTRY AND GAME; MEAT EXTRACTS; PRESERVED, DRIED AND COOKED FRUITS AND VEGETABLES; JELLIES, JAMS AND FRUIT SAUCES; EGGS; MILK; EDIBLE OILS AND FATS; FROZEN SEAFOOD AND FRESH SEAFOODACTIVE—
030MILK PRODUCTS, NAMELY, ICE CREAM, ICE MILK AND FROZEN YOGURT; BEVERAGES, NAMELY, COFFEE AND COFFEE BASED BEVERAGE CONTAINING MILK; AND NOODLESACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 29, 2005MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Nov 29, 2005ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Apr 14, 2005EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED—
Mar 8, 2005EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED—
Mar 8, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Sep 30, 2004EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Sep 13, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Sep 9, 2004EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Jul 29, 2004CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Mar 23, 2004EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Mar 8, 2004EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Mar 8, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Sep 22, 2003EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Aug 28, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Aug 22, 2003EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
May 29, 2003EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Mar 26, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Mar 24, 2003EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Sep 24, 2002NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jul 2, 2002PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jun 12, 2002NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Nov 2, 2001CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Oct 31, 2001CNEAEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED—
Oct 26, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance