Drawing for MELALEUCA...THE WELLNESS COMPANY

USPTO serial 76302883

MELALEUCA...THE WELLNESS COMPANY

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
LEHKER, DAWN FELDMAN
Law office
DIVISIONAL UNIT

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with MELALEUCA...THE WELLNESS COMPANY?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Tyrie Barrott, Esq.

TYRIE BARROTT ESQ MELALEUCA INC3910 S YELLOWSTONE HWYIDAHO FALLS, ID 83402UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035MAIL ORDER CATALOG SERVICES FEATURING HEALTH CARE PRODUCTS, NUTRITIONALS, DIETARY SUPPLEMENTS, VITAMINS AND MINERAL SUPPLEMENTS, NUTRITIOUS FOODS, SNACKS AND BEVERAGES, COSMETICS, TOILETRIES, LAUNDRY CARE PRODUCTS, CLEANERS, SOAPS, DISHWASHER DETERGENTS, AIR FRESHENERS, DETERGENTS AND DISINFECTANTSACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 17, 2006MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jul 17, 2006ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Nov 28, 2005EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Nov 14, 2005EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Nov 14, 2005EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Sep 29, 2005FAXXFAX SENT—
Jun 9, 2005ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 9, 2005REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
May 17, 2005NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Dec 21, 2004OP.TOPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999—
Dec 21, 2004OP.DOPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999—
Aug 25, 2004TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jul 24, 2003OP.IOPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999—
Apr 2, 2003ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
Mar 4, 2003PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Feb 12, 2003NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Dec 18, 2002CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Sep 12, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 12, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Mar 11, 2002CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 4, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 29, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance