USPTO serial 76303021
TURBO STEKI
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- LAMOTHE, LESLEY
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with TURBO STEKI?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
James G. Coplit
JAMES G COPLIT GRIMES & BATTERSBY, LLP488 MAIN AVE 3RD FLNORWALK, CT 06851-1008UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | PRE-RECORDED AUDIO DISCS AND CD ROM'S FEATURING MUSIC; COMPUTER PERIPHERAL MOUSE PADS; COMPUTER SOFTWARE FOR GAMES; COMPUTER HARDWARE; MUSICAL SOUND RECORDINGS; MUSICAL VIDEO RECORDINGS; PRE-RECORDED AUDIO CASSETTES FEATURING MUSIC; PRE-RECORDED VIDEO CASSETTES FEATURING MUSIC, ENTERTAINMENT PROGRAMMING AND GAMES; MOTION PICTURE FILMS; VIDEO DISCS FEATURING ENTERTAINMENT PROGRAMMING; COMPUTER GAME CARTRIDGES; COMPUTER GAME CASSETTES; COMPUTER GAME DISCS; COMPUTER GAME JOYSTICKS; COMPUTER GAME PROGRAMS; COMPUTER GAME SOFTWARE; COMPUTER GAME TAPES; INTERACTIVE MULTIMEDIA COMPUTER GAMES; INTERACTIVE VIDEO GAME PROGRAMS; VIDEO GAME CARTRIDGES; VIDEO GAME DISCS; VIDEO GAME INTERACTIVE CONTROL UNITS; VIDEO GAME JOYSTICKS; STAND ALONE VIDEO GAME MACHINES; VIDEO GAME SOFTWARE; VIDEO GAME TAPE CASSETTES; VIDEO OUTPUT GAMES; AND VIRTUAL REALITY GAME SOFTWARE | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 31, 2004 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Aug 11, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Nov 17, 2003 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 7, 2003 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Nov 7, 2003 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jun 17, 2003 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Apr 17, 2003 | IUCN | NOTICE OF ALLOWANCE CANCELLED | — |
| Dec 10, 2002 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Sep 17, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 28, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 9, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 8, 2002 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 1, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 5, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 29, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |