USPTO serial 76303142
EMPORIO BOTHANICO
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- FROMM, MARTHA L
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with EMPORIO BOTHANICO?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
CRISTINA A CARVALHO
CRISTINA A CARVALHO ARENT FOX KINTNER PLOTKIN & KAHN1050 CONNECTICUT AVE NWWASHINGTON, DC 20036-5339UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | Cologne; lipstick; facial mask; suntan oil, suntan lotion, suntan gel; hair care preparations; hair dye; cosmetic products for eyelashes, namely, artificial eyelashes;skin creams, cosmetic face creams; deodorant soap; deodorant for personal use; nail polish; eyebrow pencil; hair spray for firmly holding and styling hair; cleansing milk for cleansing face and body; hair lotions; skin lotions for cosmetic use; after-shave lotion; facial make-up; bath oil; cleansing body oil; perfume oil; essential oil for personal and cosmetic use; perfume products, namely, perfumes, colognes, toilet water, perfume oils; make-up remover; mascara; non-medicated foot soap to prevent sweating; skin soaps; talcum powder; nail care preparations; hair shampoos and hair conditioner; and bath salts | ACTIVE | Jan 15, 2002 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 8, 2004 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 6, 2004 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 3, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 19, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 7, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 24, 2004 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Feb 20, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 28, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jan 20, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 20, 2004 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jan 20, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 16, 2003 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 15, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 15, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 14, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 14, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 13, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 16, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 29, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 29, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 13, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |