USPTO serial 76303202
Serial No. 76303202
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CHICOSKI, JENNIFER D
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with Serial No. 76303202?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
6411 TE HEERLEN, NL
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Susan T. Brown, Paul L. Sharer, Mark G. Paulson, Richard A. Steinberg, Christopher M. Beck, and Richard M. Assmus
SUSAN T BROWN, PAUL L SHARER, MARK G MAYER, BROWN, ROWE & MAW LLP1909 K ST NWINTELLECTUAL PROPERTY DEPTWASHINGTON, DC 20006Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | CHEMICAL PRODUCTS FOR INDUSTRIAL AND SCIENTIFIC PURPOSE, NAMELY, BIOLOGICAL PREPARATIONS, PREPARATIONS FOR IN VITRO DIAGNOSIS AND CHEMICAL REAGENTS FOR LABORATORIES, ALL FOR SCIENTIFIC RESEARCH USE | ACTIVE | — |
| 005 | BIOLOGICAL PREPARATIONS FOR THE IN VITRO DIAGNOSIS AND CHEMICAL REAGENTS, ALL FOR CLINICAL MEDICAL AND VETERINARY USE; PREPARATIONS FOR SEROLOGICAL DIAGNOSTICS | ACTIVE | — |
| 009 | APPARATUS FOR TESTING MILK AND OTHER LIQUIDS, NAMELY, MICROPLATES AND AMPOULES; AND DIAGNOSTIC APPARATUS NOT FOR MEDICAL USE NAMELY, MICROPLATES AND AMPOULES | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 4, 2004 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 4, 2004 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| May 14, 2003 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 27, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 29, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 5, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 27, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 24, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |