USPTO serial 76303530
IDEAL MACHINABLE PLATE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Feb 3, 2004
- Examiner
- STRASER, RICHARD
- Law office
- SCANNING ON DEMAND
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with IDEAL MACHINABLE PLATE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
DANA BREITMAN
DANA BREITMAN GOODWIN PROCTER LLP599 LEXINGTON AVENEW YORK, NY 10022-6030UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 006 | Aluminum heated plates | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Aug 19, 2002 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by HULETT ALUMINIUM (PTY) LTD.
- Other trademarks owned by Empire Resources, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Empire Resources, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 006
- Similar marks named IDEAL MACHINABLE PLATE
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 10, 2010 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Jun 9, 2007 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Feb 3, 2004 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Dec 2, 2003 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 3, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 3, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 6, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 5, 2003 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| May 2, 2003 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| May 2, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 2, 2003 | ZZZY | PREVIOUS ACTION COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Dec 13, 2002 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Dec 13, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 11, 2002 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 18, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 19, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 9, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 1, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 1, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 24, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |