USPTO serial 76303662
NEXTSOURCE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- LORENZO, ROBERT
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE UNIT
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with NEXTSOURCE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jeffrey L. Costellia
JEFFREY L COSTELLIA NIXON PEABODY LLP8180 GREENSBORO DR STE 800MC LEAN, VA 22102-3823UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 041 | Educational services, namely, providing workshops, seminars, one-to-one training, online training and home study at an advanced degree level in the field of business man agent and information technology | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 1, 2005 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Feb 1, 2005 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jul 29, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| May 1, 2004 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 26, 2004 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Mar 26, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 24, 2004 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Dec 23, 2003 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 17, 2003 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Nov 1, 2003 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 24, 2003 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| May 15, 2003 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| May 15, 2003 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Mar 24, 2003 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Mar 24, 2003 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 24, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 23, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 24, 2002 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jul 2, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 12, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 25, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 31, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 2, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |