USPTO serial 76303689
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Thomas W. Brooke
THOMAS W BROOKE HOLLAND & KNIGHT2099 PENNSYLVANIA AVE NW STE 100WASHINGTON, DC 20006-6801UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | Biodegradable chemical composition for removing deposits of grease, rust, limestone, carbon, scale and other form of oxidation and sediment from plastic, PVC, ferrous and non-ferrous metal surfaces | ACTIVE | — |
| 007 | High performance pumps for biodegradable chemical cleaning compositions for removing deposits and grease, rust, limestone, carbon, scale and other forms of oxidations and sediment from plastic, PVC, ferrous and non-ferrous metal surface | ACTIVE | — |
| 011 | Industrial filtration units to capture and filter out deposits and grease, rust, limestone, carbon, scale and other forms of oxidation and sediment | ACTIVE | — |
| 037 | Providing plastic, PVC, ferrous and non-ferrous metal surfaces cleaning and rehabilitation services | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 22, 2004 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 18, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Oct 6, 2003 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 4, 2003 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 30, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 30, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 10, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 27, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 27, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 25, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |