Drawing for E PIANO-E-COMPETITION

USPTO serial 76303887

E PIANO-E-COMPETITION

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
EDGE, KATRINA
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 111 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with E PIANO-E-COMPETITION?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Michael Lublinski

RICHARD H ZAITLEN PILLSBURY WINTHROP LLPSTE 2800725 S FIGUEROA STLOS ANGELES, CA 90017

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
041Promoting and conducting piano competitions, entertainment in the nature of piano competitions, and providing information and instructional materials in the field of music, all the aforesaid services provided via global computer networksACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 2, 2006MAB1ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT—
Mar 2, 2006ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED—
Mar 1, 2006EXARTEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED—
Aug 30, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 29, 2005CNRTSU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 26, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 22, 2005SUPCSTATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Aug 11, 2005IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED—
Aug 11, 2005EISUTEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVEDThe applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action.
Jul 28, 2005EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED—
Jul 28, 2005EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED—
Jul 28, 2005EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jan 27, 2005EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Jan 27, 2005EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Jan 27, 2005EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Aug 16, 2004EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Aug 4, 2004CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Jul 27, 2004EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Jul 27, 2004EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Feb 13, 2004EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Jan 27, 2004EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Jan 27, 2004EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Sep 12, 2003EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Jul 28, 2003EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Jul 28, 2003EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jul 28, 2003TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jan 28, 2003NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Nov 5, 2002PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Oct 16, 2002NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Aug 25, 2002CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
May 24, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 8, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 13, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 31, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance