Drawing for TRANSFORMING SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT

USPTO serial 76303947

TRANSFORMING SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
WAHLBERG, STACY B
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with TRANSFORMING SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Steven Lieberman

STEVEN LIEBERMAN ROTHWELL FIGG ERNST & MANBECK PC1425 K ST NW STE 800WASHINGTON, DC 20005UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009SOFTWARE PROGRAM FOR USE BY DEVELOPERS AND PROGRAMMERS FOR MANAGING SOFTWARE COMPONENTS, NAMELY, LOCATING, RESEARCHING, STORING, REUSING, ACQUIRING, LICENSING AND PURCHASING SOFTWARE COMPONENTSACTIVEJun 4, 2000
035COMPUTERIZED ONLINE RETAIL SERVICES ON THE GLOBAL COMPUTER NETWORK FEATURING COMPUTER SOFTWARE; ONLINE DISTRIBUTORSHIP SERVICES IN THE FIELD OF COMPUTER SOFTWAREACTIVEJun 4, 2000

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 1, 2002ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED
Sep 13, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Sep 13, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Apr 30, 2002UNPRUNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED
Mar 1, 2002CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED
Jan 22, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Nov 29, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 31, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance