USPTO serial 76303948
GENOMEVISION
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BELL, MARLENE D
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with GENOMEVISION?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Fred W. Hathaway
FRED W HATHAWAY BURNS DOANE SWECKER ET ALP O BOX 1404ALEXANDRIA, VA 22313-1404UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 005 | Pharmaceuticals, namely, pharmaceutical compounds, therapeutic agents, and biotechnologic substances incorporating the results of genomic research, namely, drugs and anti-infective agents for use in combating resistant infectious diseases for human, veterinary and agricultural applications; reagents, namely, diagnostic reagents for clinical or medical laboratory use | ACTIVE | — |
| 009 | Computer software, featuring a database used for genetic or protein analysis; computer hardware and computer peripherals; DNA micro array chips; scientific instruments, namely, DNA sequencers, PCR machines, clone picking robots, DNA preparation used in the preparation and separation of DNA sequences | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Biotechnology research and development services in the field of genome research, namely, genetic sequencing; genomic library sequencing services; library construction services; library screening services; single nucleotide polymorphorisms (SNP) detection and screening services, namely, performing functional assays of genes, sequencing genes, identifying and characterizing genes; micro array services, namely, gene sequencing typing and chemical compound screening and gene expression micro array image analysis; high throughput screening services; bioninformatic services, namely, protein identification, characterization and analysis in the field of biomedical research; genomic assembly and finishing services; gene mapping and fingerprinting services; amplification services, namely, gene cloning identification services; biotechnological research and development services, namely, drug target identification and characterization; medical and scientific research, namely, conducting clinical trails | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 9, 2004 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 9, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 10, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 1, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 1, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 26, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 25, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 21, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |