Drawing for CLASSIC FIJI

USPTO serial 76304333

CLASSIC FIJI

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
HICKEY,TONI
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with CLASSIC FIJI?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Martin R. Greenstein

KEVIN G SMITH SUGHRUE MION PLLC2100 PENNSYLVANIA AVE NW STE 800WASHINGTON, DC 20037-3213UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
039Organizing and arranging custom and packaged vacation trips, travel tours and sightseeing tours, and on-location golf, sports and entertainment activities and activities packages sold as a part thereof; wholesale and retail travel agency services, namely making reservations and bookings for air, ground and sea transportation services; organizing and arranging ground escorted and self-driving tours and excursions; providing information about travel, tours, vacations and vacation travel packages via a website on the InternetACTIVE—
042Wholesale and retail travel agency services, namely making reservations and bookings for temporary lodging at hotels, resorts and condominiumsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 11, 2005MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
May 11, 2005ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jul 26, 2004EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Jul 7, 2004CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Jun 17, 2004EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Jun 17, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Mar 16, 2004TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Dec 3, 2003EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Dec 3, 2003EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Dec 3, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Nov 6, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
May 30, 2003EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Apr 21, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Apr 18, 2003EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Dec 17, 2002NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Sep 24, 2002PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Sep 4, 2002NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jun 14, 2002CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Apr 5, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 5, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Oct 2, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 25, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance