USPTO serial 76304397
PRO WALK
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MCBRIDE, THEODORE M
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 103 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with PRO WALK?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
JAMES F HARVEY III
JAMES F HARVEY III HARVEY & ASSOCIATES PC3750 W MAIN ST STE 108NORMAN, OK 73072UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | ELECTRIC POWERED HORSE WALKER | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 1, 2007 | UNDN | UNDELIVERABLE MAIL - NO ACTION TAKEN | — |
| Feb 9, 2007 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 8, 2007 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 7, 2006 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 6, 2006 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 29, 2006 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Dec 5, 2005 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jun 2, 2005 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 1, 2005 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| May 23, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| May 16, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 16, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 6, 2005 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 5, 2005 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 3, 2005 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jul 29, 2004 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 13, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jul 13, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 13, 2004 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 27, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jan 14, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 30, 2003 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Aug 18, 2003 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 18, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 30, 2003 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 18, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 29, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 29, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 11, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 10, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 18, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 26, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 25, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 3, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |